Abstract
Introduction
Experimental
Methods
Data
Discussion
Conlcusions
References
Projects Page
|
 |
Introduction
Films of 4He
adsorbed on solid surfaces have been studied for many years and a standard
picture of their properties on most surfaces has been established [1].
The interaction between a 4He film and nearly all surfaces is
so strongly attractive that the first one or two atomic layers of the film
are solidified or otherwise localized. Subsequent layers remain fluid and
become superfluid at low temperature. The experimentally observed signatures
of superfluid onset are remarkably independent of the properties of the
substrate; the 2D superfluid transition has the same characteristics whether
it occurs on solid hydrogen, mylar or gold. Similarly, the standard Kosterlitz-Thouless
(KT) model [2,3] used to describe the superfluid transition in films is
strictly two dimensional and is independent of the boundary conditions
at the substrate. The KT picture has been extremely successful in quantitatively
explaining the shear response [4], thermal conductivity [5] and third sound
modes [6] of 4He films near superfluid onset on a variety of
substrates.
Recently, alkali
metal surfaces have proven to be radically different adsorption substrates
for 4He and other simple gases. Adsorption potentials for 4He
on the alkali metals are “weak” which means that the potential well formed
by the competition between long-range van der Waals attraction and short
range Pauli repulsion has a depth comparable with the binding energy of
a 4He atom in the bulk fluid. The phases of helium on alkali
metal substrates have been theoretically analyzed by Cheng, Cole, Saam
and Treiner [7]. Their analysis has been confirmed by experiments on the
weakest substrate, cesium. Cs is non-wet at low temperatures and wet above
a wetting temperature near 2 K. Between 2 K and about 2.5 K it displays
a prewetting transition [8], a first order phase transition on the vapor
side of the bulk liquid-vapor coexistence curve marked by two-phase equilibrium
between thin and thick films. The effects of first order prewetting on
the KT transition have also been investigated [9]. In the case of thin
cesium substrates, the KT line terminates on the prewetting phase boundary
at a critical endpoint. For temperatures above the critical endpoint, prewetting
and the KT transition are distinctly different transitions. Below the critical
endpoint, the KT transition does not exist and prewetting is a direct transition
between a thin normal phase and a thick superfluid phase. Since the thin
phase is always normal on Cs, superfluid onset can only be studied above
the wetting temperature.
There have been several
previous investigations of 4He adsorption on Rb . Rubidium
is a slightly stronger substrate than cesium, and is theoretically expected
to have a lower wetting temperature [7,10]. A lower wetting temperature
provides an experimental opportunity to study superfluid onset over a wider
temperature range. Superfluid onset on weak substrates is particularly
interesting because even the first adsorbed 4He layer is expected
to remain fluid so the inert layer of solidified helium which forms on
strong substrates can be avoided [7].
There have also been
experimental investigations of 4He adsorption on Rb [11-14].
The most extensive of these studies have utilized heat flow measurements
to map the superfluid onset. This type of experiment can detect transitions
to a superfluid state, but, as shown in [9], superfluid onset and prewetting
are not necessarily coincident phase transitions. In this paper, we report
experimental observations of both the wetting and superfluid properties
of 4He films on Rb using the quartz microbalance technique.
Characteristic features in the frequency shift and the dissipation allow
us to construct a phase diagram showing the boundaries between thick and
thin and superfluid and normal phases. Above 1.9K, prewetting and superfluid
onset are distinct phase transitions, while below this temperature, the
transitions are strongly coupled. At temperatures below 1.9K, superfluid
onset on Rb is surprisingly different from the Cs case investigated in
reference [9]. Although the superfluid transition on Rb retains Kosterlitz-Thouless
type features, the transition is hysteretic and the size and temperature
dependence of the features do not conform to the universal predictions
of the KT theory. Another important practical difference between Rb and
Cs is that our technique for producing alkali metal substrates is less
reproducible for Rb. Isotherms on Rb films evaporated and annealed in nominally
the same way had features whose location was reasonably well defined, but
whose height, width and shape varied substantially from one substrate to
another.
This paper is organized
as follows. Section II contains a discussion of the experimental procedures,
including the techniques used for preparing the Rb substrates and a description
of a method for determining the chemical potential at low temperatures
when the vapor pressure is too low to measure directly. In section III,
we present the data, which consist primarily of measurements of the frequency
shift and the dissipation of the quartz microbalance as a function of 4He
chemical potential at constant T. A number of these isotherms from 0.15K
to 2.2K are used to assemble a m-T phase diagram
that shows the relationship between the prewetting line and the KT transition
line [15]. Measurements of the superfluid density and dissipation at onset
show that in many cases, superfluid transitions on Rb do not follow the
standard KT model. Evidence of two types of behavior in the thin film phase
above and below 0.3K is also presented. In section IV we discuss the wetting
and superfluid onset behavior of 4He on Rb and compare it to
results obtained with Cs and conventional strong substrates such as Au.
The possibility that the KT line meets the prewetting line in a multicritical
point and the possible role of substrate disorder is also considered. Finally,
section V provides a summary of our findings.
|
|